*NOW BOOKED FOR 2024* Transitmania 15 @ Santa Pod 19th to 21st July 2024 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Use this forum to post technical questions & problems about any Transit

Moderator: Luke

FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby tb2000 » Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:59 pm

Recently I was in a situation where I could've done with even more height inside my med roof van, which could happen again. I was wondering about the high top Transit, as in is there any difference in the internal height between the FWD and RWD? I know the floor is a bit higher up on the RWD to accommodate the prop and diff etc, but did Ford make the top that bit higher or do you lose a bit of height over the FWD?

Cheers all!
tb2000
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:34 pm

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby andz327 » Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:49 pm

tb2000 wrote:Recently I was in a situation where I could've done with even more height inside my med roof van, which could happen again. I was wondering about the high top Transit, as in is there any difference in the internal height between the FWD and RWD? I know the floor is a bit higher up on the RWD to accommodate the prop and diff etc, but did Ford make the top that bit higher or do you lose a bit of height over the FWD?

Cheers all!
All versions of FWD have more internal height than their RWD counterparts
User avatar
andz327
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:44 am

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby tb2000 » Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:57 pm

Ok thanks for the reply. I'll be looking for a FWD hightop at some point then! Luckily I don't really need towing capability (highly unlikely to ever need it), even so I think the FWD T350 can tow 2 ton anyhow. I would expect FWD T350's (or anything over T300) are harder to find than RWD versions!

Out of interest do you know what the height difference is? Is it just the step difference (which appears to be about 4 or 5 inches)?

Cheers :)
tb2000
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:34 pm

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby ned » Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:14 pm

Yes its the hight of the step that's the difference. N
RUST IS LIGHTER THEN CARBON FIBRE

57 transit 85t260 2.2 swb, moondust silver.
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=209987

03 transit 125t280 2.0 tdci swb 229,000 miles.
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=168296
User avatar
ned
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 21378
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:01 am
Location: Somewhere in time

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby knobby1 » Wed Nov 08, 2017 8:35 pm

Yep...the FWD's have ~4" more head-room than their RWD equivalent. I'm 6' tall and can stand up straight in my RWD LWB HR...with ~1" to spare.... so a FWD HR could handle a chap or chappette ~6'4".

Lord Knobrot
2008 2.4L RWD 170+PS 6-speed 350 LWB High Roof.

When I die, I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather, not screaming like the passengers in his car..!
User avatar
knobby1
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15837
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:36 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby ned » Wed Nov 08, 2017 8:38 pm

So the big question is, is the T350 FWD a 2.2L? (mk7). N
RUST IS LIGHTER THEN CARBON FIBRE

57 transit 85t260 2.2 swb, moondust silver.
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=209987

03 transit 125t280 2.0 tdci swb 229,000 miles.
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=168296
User avatar
ned
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 21378
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:01 am
Location: Somewhere in time

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby Altransit » Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:13 pm

nedforceone wrote:So the big question is, is the T350 FWD a 2.2L? (mk7). N

:? What else would it be :?: :P :mrgreen:
1994 Mk4 SWB 115 Minibus 70ps Di (R.I.P.)
1997 Mk5 SWB 115 Minibus 70ps Di (Gone, but not forgotten!)
2004 Mk6 SWB T280 Medium Roof 85PS 2.0 TDDi - Vantunered (Also gone)
2008 Mk7 SWB T280 Medium Roof 85PS 2.2 TDCi - Also Vantunered
User avatar
Altransit
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby ned » Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:21 pm

Altransit wrote:
nedforceone wrote:So the big question is, is the T350 FWD a 2.2L? (mk7). N

:? What else would it be :?: :P :mrgreen:


:oops: :lol: Oh yeah didn't think like that, at least the op can search 2.2L 350 to find what he/she needs :wink: N
RUST IS LIGHTER THEN CARBON FIBRE

57 transit 85t260 2.2 swb, moondust silver.
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=209987

03 transit 125t280 2.0 tdci swb 229,000 miles.
viewtopic.php?f=27&t=168296
User avatar
ned
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 21378
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:01 am
Location: Somewhere in time

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby Altransit » Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:23 pm

Sadly, the Euro 5's are all 2.2 litre, FWD & RWD :roll: :)
1994 Mk4 SWB 115 Minibus 70ps Di (R.I.P.)
1997 Mk5 SWB 115 Minibus 70ps Di (Gone, but not forgotten!)
2004 Mk6 SWB T280 Medium Roof 85PS 2.0 TDDi - Vantunered (Also gone)
2008 Mk7 SWB T280 Medium Roof 85PS 2.2 TDCi - Also Vantunered
User avatar
Altransit
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby tb2000 » Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:37 pm

Thanks all! Yeah I was guessing it was probably the same height inside minus the bit for the raised floor, but I thought there was a small chance Ford might've altered the roof to make it the same dimensions inside. Presumably that would've required all manner of different panels altering though!

If/when I go for one it'll probably be at least a T300 (more likely a T330 or T350, although this does make the MOT a bit more expensive!), shame they don't do bigger than the 2.2 in FWD but i'd try to find a 140bhp version same as my T280 MWB med roof van I have now. It goes well enough for me! :)

Tony
tb2000
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:34 pm

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby andz327 » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:27 pm

If you have a fwd just now, its the height difference between cab area and cargo area(part where bulkhead bolts on )
User avatar
andz327
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:44 am

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby andz327 » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:52 pm

tb2000 wrote:Thanks all! Yeah I was guessing it was probably the same height inside minus the bit for the raised floor, but I thought there was a small chance Ford might've altered the roof to make it the same dimensions inside. Presumably that would've required all manner of different panels altering though!

If/when I go for one it'll probably be at least a T300 (more likely a T330 or T350, although this does make the MOT a bit more expensive!), shame they don't do bigger than the 2.2 in FWD but i'd try to find a 140bhp version same as my T280 MWB med roof van I have now. It goes well enough for me! :)

Tony
You don't need any bigger in fwd, I've a 130 lwb/med roof 300 and powers great, and very economical with 40+ mpg even when I'm towing and can get 47mpg if I'm running on cruise at 60mph (56mph on nav), was watching a jumbo twin wheeler on ebay and message the guy about mpg as i could get more towing work with the big guy but he said £20 only gets him 45mls.....fook that
User avatar
andz327
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:44 am

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby andz327 » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:54 pm

andz327 wrote:
tb2000 wrote:Thanks all! Yeah I was guessing it was probably the same height inside minus the bit for the raised floor, but I thought there was a small chance Ford might've altered the roof to make it the same dimensions inside. Presumably that would've required all manner of different panels altering though!

If/when I go for one it'll probably be at least a T300 (more likely a T330 or T350, although this does make the MOT a bit more expensive!), shame they don't do bigger than the 2.2 in FWD but i'd try to find a 140bhp version same as my T280 MWB med roof van I have now. It goes well enough for me! :)

Tony
You don't need any bigger in fwd, I've a 130 lwb/med roof 300 and powers great, and very economical with 40+ mpg even when I'm towing and can get 47mpg if I'm running on cruise at 60mph (56mph on nav), was watching a jumbo twin wheeler on ebay and message the guy about mpg as i could get more towing work with the big guy but he said £20 only gets him 45mls.....fook that
And for the non believers of mpg this was on A9 100mile stretch of A- roadImage
User avatar
andz327
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:44 am

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby bigjohnthomas » Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:34 pm

You get better diff ratios in the fwd when you find one
Rwds are for dirty builder and allotment types
User avatar
bigjohnthomas
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 26388
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Uranus

Re: FWD and RWD MK7 height difference

Postby birdie » Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:02 am

tb2000 wrote:Ok thanks for the reply. I'll be looking for a FWD hightop at some point then! Luckily I don't really need towing capability (highly unlikely to ever need it), even so I think the FWD T350 can tow 2 ton anyhow. I would expect FWD T350's (or anything over T300) are harder to find than RWD versions!

Out of interest do you know what the height difference is? Is it just the step difference (which appears to be about 4 or 5 inches)?

Cheers :)


My t350 fwd has a towing weight of 2800kgs
mk7 T350 FWD towing van
User avatar
birdie
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 4:34 pm

Next

Return to Technical Problems & Questions



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.