Fatsue87 wrote:I always say bigger is better my plumber friend has a custom that’s a nice van but very small and I’ve got a 2015 l4 h3 and love the size nothing worse than moving gear around to get to stuff
Fatsue87 wrote:It’s not to bad to b honest all I have an issue with is it catches the back step on the floor a lot when backing up drives and stuff like that
hughesyn wrote:We've got two 2.0 Mk8s and the fuel consumption is definitely better than the mk7s.
On the other hand you need adblue.
One is a 130 fwd manual, gets about 32 mpg. The same driver got 28 mpg in a mk7.
Mines a 170 auto and gets 30 mpg.
Before this van I had a 3.0 Navara which did 25 mpg so I'm happy.
man le-mans wrote:That’s what I’ve got coming 130 fwd 350 manual. My mk7 does about 28mpg running 3 tons with short trips. But the 2 people I know who’s gone from mk7 to mk8 say it’s worst. I wonder if it’s the different driving styles
Bet the 170 auto is a lovely van to drive
Return to Mk8 Fourth Generation Transits
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.