*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


Any idea how difficult a 2.4 TDCI 140 into MK2 Di would be?

Post all custom related threads here!

Moderator: Luke

Postby BEHEMOTH » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:10 pm

School Boy wrote:Can you elaborate please, sounds interesting.


I dunno if you were askin me to elaborate, or one of the other guys, but basically i was thinking it would be cool to have a modern 140bhp MK7 transit engine in a MK2 Body, and was wondering did anyone else have any advice/tips/warnings etc.

The other options would be:

-Nissan 2.8 straight 6 diesel with big turbo and a nissan box, and 4 wheel drive

or

-Four wheel drive using county parts and a Di

0r

-Turbo converted Di.


I basically want to do something mad with a MK2 transit, but dont want to go down the route of a cossie turbo or a V8, as i think A tricked out transit with a diesel engine would be cool
BEHEMOTH
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:16 pm

Postby Luke » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:18 pm

Turbo Di would be easyest :lol:

i dont think we have any turbo Di mk2's on here tho - im suprised there isnt more of them :?
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44561
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby madmark » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:32 pm

lovely engine 85ps di! :wink:
madmark
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:29 am

Postby Luke » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:40 pm

madmark wrote:lovely engine 85ps di! :wink:
more like a 115ps :wink: :lol:
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44561
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby transitgeoff » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:51 pm

duratorq is a lot more reliable than a smelly old turbo di, and about half the weight and about twice as economical and twice as quite and twice(or maybe three times :wink: ) as quick and twice as smooth infact to put it in a nutshell TWICE BETTER :D
transitgeoff
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 6574
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 7:32 pm

Postby Luke » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:52 pm

transitgeoff wrote:duratorq is a lot more reliable than a smelly old turbo di, and about half the weight and about twice as economical and twice as quite and twice(or maybe three times :wink: ) as quick and twice as smooth infact to put it in a nutshell TWICE BETTER :D
just a guess but i'd think a Turbo Di would be twice as easy to fit :lol:
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44561
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby transitgeoff » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:57 pm

:lol: :lol:
transitgeoff
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 6574
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 7:32 pm

Postby chadmat » Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:03 am

Would a duratorq fit in a mk5 then?
In a MK6 280 SWB semi hi!!!!
There you go! At last!
User avatar
chadmat
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:28 am
Location: Blackpool, In The Norf,

Postby Sundowner » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:29 am

you can fit any engine into mk2 transit
Yeah i know its big green and rusty so move your Porsche before i bash it with 460 cubes of fords finest cast iron
User avatar
Sundowner
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:01 pm

Postby motorwise » Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:08 pm

virtually anything will fit in anything with a bit of work - obviously within reason, you'd have trouble getting a jaguar straight six in a punto for instance :lol:
Ford Transit - Backbone Of Britain
http://www.motorwise.net
if you want to get on in life, its not what you know, its not who you know, its what you know about who you know
User avatar
motorwise
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 7980
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:49 am
Location: Bromley Kent

Postby pete_the_4x4 » Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:34 pm

just missed out on anouther sprinter i was going to try that in my van
if you think my van is dirty you should see my pants
User avatar
pete_the_4x4
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 9:32 am
Location: grays essex

Postby AndyG » Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:43 pm

chadmat wrote:Would a duratorq fit in a mk5 then?
Hope we're talking 2.4 TDCI :!: :shock: 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
Image
Ford Transit 120 TDI EPIC Automatic. 0-60 in a leisurely and smooth 12.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 19.1 seconds. Now where's all these faster? manual Di s?
User avatar
AndyG
Site Admin
 
Posts: 27833
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:14 am
Location: West London

Postby Sundowner » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:19 am

What about a toyota hiace 2.8di engine

If you want reliabilty you cant go past one

I have a 1995 2.8 hiace i got it at chrismass and it had 150000km on it its now got 212000km thats 60000km in just 4 months and it hauls it will flog a sprinter, and no worries passing an iveco daily as they're always on a back of a tow truck broken

The late mod transits are hard to catch on the flat but they run out of puff up hills and are renowned for poor reliabilty

We got a brand new 2007 3.0tdi slwb hiace yesterday and WOW these things fly
Yeah i know its big green and rusty so move your Porsche before i bash it with 460 cubes of fords finest cast iron
User avatar
Sundowner
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:01 pm

Postby School Boy » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:24 pm

FredTransit wrote: DI V Duratorq? Duratorq relyability (or lack of)?


Those bit please.

Sorry, I havnt been able to get on here for a few days and I should have made my question clearer.
Image
User avatar
School Boy
Under age driver!!
Under age driver!!
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:01 pm

Postby Aragorn » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:48 pm

to be honest i'd pick the newer engine

in the same way modern petrol engines are more complex so are the diesels

people happily fit cossie 24vs to their vans, u dont see them using old carbed cologne v6s because they're shite so although the modern engine has more to possibly go wrong its good points far outweigh bad ones.

the duratorq will be more efficient, cleaner, quieter and more powerful that an old scabby di engine and miles more tunable too

as for them being unreliable, ive not heard or much bar tensioner issues but thats something u'd just check and fix like any recall

and modern engines DO last longer if maintained simply because the materials and build tolerances are spot on

how many 10 year old modern 16v engines do u see reeking out blue smoke compared to ten years ago looking back at the engines that were available back then!

fit the tdci!
Aragorn
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:29 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Customising and one offs



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.