sc_BK wrote:Not sure if this is the law, but I think all company vehicles are also supposed to display no smoking signs
Yep
Moderator: Luke
sc_BK wrote:Not sure if this is the law, but I think all company vehicles are also supposed to display no smoking signs



FredTransit wrote:Well I am well chffed about this, niether me or Gary smoke and have been trying for years to stop the drivers smoking in the vans.




rover wrote:FredTransit wrote:Well I am well chffed about this, niether me or Gary smoke and have been trying for years to stop the drivers smoking in the vans.
Thats fair enough Fred they are your vans, but why the hell should they try and stop owner/drivers smoking in their own vans? Poxy F***ng govenment![]()
Rover.

rover wrote:FredTransit wrote:Well I am well chffed about this, niether me or Gary smoke and have been trying for years to stop the drivers smoking in the vans.
Thats fair enough Fred they are your vans, but why the hell should they try and stop owner/drivers smoking in their own vans? Poxy F***ng govenment![]()
Rover.

rover wrote:FredTransit wrote:Well I am well chffed about this, niether me or Gary smoke and have been trying for years to stop the drivers smoking in the vans.
Thats fair enough Fred they are your vans, but why the hell should they try and stop owner/drivers smoking in their own vans? Poxy F***ng govenment![]()
Rover.




This is just a reason to not give a person what they are entitled to and pay heavily for.smokers pay much more tax than a none smoker.whats next? too fat,too thin,too old,too young,wrong postcode,it will never stop.All you none smokers bleating,it will be your turn soon.there was a case recentley that have banned clowns at parties from using bubbles to entertain for the risk of slipping,whats next then banning jelly and ice cream,surley that proposes the same risk.theres no wonder this country is emptying of decent people by the hundreds of thousands every year.Smooth Hound wrote:Its funny iwas watching a programme about how the nhs is saying it wont perform operations etc on people until they have given up smoking for a certain amount of time, the reason they say is that it is safer to do an operation on someone that doesnt smoke and they dont like taking unnecessary risks, so someone put the question to the spokesperson about passive smokers and how if it affects them as much as it is said it does then i presume there partner would have to give up or where ever the passive smoke is coming from, in order to pass the so called smoke test, which is an actual test to see whether you have smoked at all during the last coulpe of weeks or days, and the doctor said that the passive smokers test would be ok because the amount in then is vertually insignificant and will not be a problem, so it seems they change the goalposts as and when it suits there needs, .



Users browsing this forum: No registered users
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.