Moderator: Luke
tranny van man wrote:that cant be right can it? surely if it was true it would be well in production by now?
madvanman wrote:tranny van man wrote:that cant be right can it? surely if it was true it would be well in production by now?
i dont think the governments would like that.
how would the government tax your use of tap water or even sea water as fuel, it would cost them a mint in lost revenue.

madvanman wrote:i know the law on taxing biodiesel/svo are reasonably clear, but the problem with using the 'splitting water into gasses' method is that you are NOT using the water as fuel you are using it to convert to fuel as the hydrogen/oxygen is the fuel, and as far as the avarage copper is concerned the visible parts of the conversion look like an ordinary lpg conversion.

FredTransit wrote:Good point, but it would be interesting to see what the excise people would think of it. Like you said, the government would loose millions.



stevew wrote:Ha ha ha ha ha!!!
Biggest laugh I've had in a long time!![]()
You don't get something for nothing. Ignore the laws of physics as much as you want, this is never going to work.
Steve
Luke wrote:does anyone know of anyone, who knows anyone, who knows anyone who's done it
no cos its in mi radiatorstranny van man wrote:how does that work then? do you need petrol or diesel in aswell then, i dont understand


Users browsing this forum: No registered users
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.