*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


Roofrack and fuel consumption question

An area for members to hang out and chat, discuss anything transit related!

Moderator: Luke

Roofrack and fuel consumption question

Postby Nathan_Cardiff » Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:48 pm

Hi folks.

I dont want to ask loads of questions as us newbies are meant to do, but have done a search and havent found anything related.

Picked up new van today. a 75ps :wink: SWB, what sort of fuel consumption am i expected to get and how much is a rook rack going to affect this.
I dont need a roof rack every day, just weekends once in a blue moon for carrying ladders and heras fence panels.

Help and opinions appreciated.
(if this has been asked before could someone be kind enough to post the link.)

cheers
52 SWB Transit
User avatar
Nathan_Cardiff
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 457
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:30 pm
Location: Cardiff, South Wales

Postby popuptoaster » Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:23 pm

happened to hear on the radio yesterday, a family car with an empty roof rack on gets about 10% less mpg
Image
popuptoaster
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: south essexishire

Postby Luke » Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:29 pm

popuptoaster wrote:happened to hear on the radio yesterday, a family car with an empty roof rack on gets about 10% less mpg
:shock: dunno if thats - enviromentalists exaguration :lol: but where i used to work some lads would leave there ladders at the workshop to get more top speed - made mabe 5mph difference - no one was bothered about mpg - works diesel :lol:
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44539
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby lordcakes » Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:35 pm

There will be a difference as the aerodynamics are adversely affected. The 'experts' reckon 10% for a roofrack, 4% for an open window etc. etc.

All weight will make some sort of difference but most will be unnoticeable.

If the roofrack is used once in a blue moon then whip it off. Haven't got around to doing mine yet but I am sure that makes a difference especially in my 70ps engine.
lordcakes
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Portsmouth

Postby AndyG » Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:00 pm

It only makes any difference once you start going 45+mph :D :wink:
Image
Ford Transit 120 TDI EPIC Automatic. 0-60 in a leisurely and smooth 12.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 19.1 seconds. Now where's all these faster? manual Di s?
User avatar
AndyG
Site Admin
 
Posts: 27833
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:14 am
Location: West London

Postby belly » Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:09 pm

hi ive got a full galv rack (traderrack) a 19 rung ramsay ladder a 15 rung wooden and a 15 rung ally mine is a 100ps model fwd and has the same performance as a 90ps flat out :( and thirty quid will get me about 155 miles but i do drive on the motorway flat out all the time :?
2013 VW Transporter swb T5.1GP T28 140ps Highline with extra toys.
User avatar
belly
Kaiser Chief
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:13 pm
Location: southampton

Postby AndyG » Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:47 pm

belly wrote:hi ive got a full galv rack (traderrack) a 19 rung ramsay ladder a 15 rung wooden and a 15 rung ally mine is a 100ps model fwd and has the same performance as a 90ps flat out :( and thirty quid will get me about 155 miles but i do drive on the motorway flat out all the time :?

And what would 'flat out' be :?: :wink: (on a private road :!: :lol: )
Image
Ford Transit 120 TDI EPIC Automatic. 0-60 in a leisurely and smooth 12.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 19.1 seconds. Now where's all these faster? manual Di s?
User avatar
AndyG
Site Admin
 
Posts: 27833
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:14 am
Location: West London

Postby popuptoaster » Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:08 am

[quote="lordcakes"]4% for an open window etc. etc.

quote]

just as an extra point, dunno how many of you are aware that having one window open above 30mph uses more extra fuel than having the air con on.
Image
popuptoaster
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: south essexishire

Postby stevew » Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:33 am

popuptoaster wrote:just as an extra point, dunno how many of you are aware that having one window open above 30mph uses more extra fuel than having the air con on.


In that case I'll start using my air con more often.
Oh wait....


:lol:
Steve
Van Cam, service suspended (no van!) (no cam either!)
User avatar
stevew
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 1010
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: London

Postby belly » Sat Aug 12, 2006 3:11 pm

my flat out is between 90 - 100 depending on all the usual factors that affect a commercial wind load hill etc etc and downhill ive seen 105 indicated obviously i know thats not accurate and 100 is really wound up on a flat i dont see it often :? i can feel the van struggle with my super dooper fuel guzzling drag device on top :lol: been in another 100ps fwd with no rack and at the higher speeds it picked up so much quicker :( but ho hum until i can get some hover boots like the rac man i need my ladders :D plus its only me to blame for fuel consumption i should just sit in the draft of a artic at 52 :roll: (all speeds quoted in kmh for legal reasons) :wink:
2013 VW Transporter swb T5.1GP T28 140ps Highline with extra toys.
User avatar
belly
Kaiser Chief
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:13 pm
Location: southampton


Return to Transit Talk



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.