I had a mk6 as a company van and couldn't fault it really 98,500 miles of which I done 80,000 of and all that was ever done was oil changes, brakes discs n tyres, the only little problem I had was with the brakes but that was sorted by a garage quickly so assume it wasn't too major!!?? But as I say was companies so I didn't ask! To be fair the van got thrashed everyday (red lined) and didn't blow up!! I did hear of some other mk6 vans on the company having new turbos n gear boxes, so would like to know if this is common and I had a absolute gem of a van??
That van went back to the rental company cos of the milage and replaced with a mk7 from brand new 56 plate but I only done a few thousand miles in it and I left that company, it seemed like a nice van and I liked the new interior n gearstick position etc...but I thought it was slower (both vans were 85ps) and I had fuel card so didn't take any notice if it was better or worse on fuel!! I'm now self employed so treat my vans better and do care about the fuel!! Lol!! Nearly forgot to say the only thing I did notice was the paint work appeared to get loads of pin head rust spots?? But like I say really didn't have the van long!!
Since then Ive just had combos as I haven't had the money to buy a decent mileage transit!!
So wot I really would like to know is- wot ones more economical?? Are they the same road tax?? does the mk7 have problems cos of new gearstick position?? Are there any major faults with the mk7?? I would appreciate any feed back from ppl who have done a lot of milage in these vans and what one they found best and most reliable as I'm not fussed about the face lift n cabin!! More the reliabilty n fuel economy, due to being self employed!!!
The other van I've looked at but have never drove is a vivaro but have heard they can be bit of a nightmare?? Does anyone know if they are really that bad??
I think that's all!!??
Thanks for your time lads and look forward to the feedback!!









