*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


90 td 350 quick enough?

Use this forum to highlight the areas to check when looking to buy a Transit

Moderator: Luke

90 td 350 quick enough?

Postby scottywong » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:39 pm

hi ya all! great forum. i'm currently driveing a 150 r reg(mk5?) and as i expected is slow(but needed a van sharpish and was low mileage) am soon to upgrade to a newer van, i'm a van courier and i do mainly long distance stuff so is the 90bhp guna be slow? or would i be better off with a 115 or 120? i dont want to go everywhere at 90 but would the 90,350 struggle a huge amount more than the others? and are they better on fuel the more power you have(with in reason)?
how are they when fully loaded? have driven the 280 100bhp whats going to closest to that in the long wheel base?


cheers all,scotty
scottywong
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby Guy88 » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:41 pm

You can get a 280 LWB. if you are using a 150 the equivilant of that is a 330 :D
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44

REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD

LIVIN' LOUD
User avatar
Guy88
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 17042
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Banbury, oxon

Postby AndyG » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:49 pm

IMO.
the 115 is the replacement 90 (both RWD) and has better torque :wink:
Image
Ford Transit 120 TDI EPIC Automatic. 0-60 in a leisurely and smooth 12.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 19.1 seconds. Now where's all these faster? manual Di s?
User avatar
AndyG
Site Admin
 
Posts: 27833
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:14 am
Location: West London

Postby scottywong » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:57 pm

Guy88 wrote:You can get a 280 LWB. if you are using a 150 the equivilant of that is a 330 :D



guna need a 350 really and not to sure about fwd with big weight?

cheers scotty
scottywong
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby scottywong » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:58 pm

Andyg wrote:IMO.
the 115 is the replacement 90 (both RWD) and has better torque :wink:



have you driven them? is the 90 enough(more is allways better) or a bit lacking?

cheers scotty
scottywong
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby AndyG » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:10 pm

I've driven the 90 and (this is my personal opinion) It's OK :!: A good lugger but not high performance :!:

:idea: you can always chip it :idea: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Nearly forgot :!: This engine has proved to be really reliable :wink:
Image
Ford Transit 120 TDI EPIC Automatic. 0-60 in a leisurely and smooth 12.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 19.1 seconds. Now where's all these faster? manual Di s?
User avatar
AndyG
Site Admin
 
Posts: 27833
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:14 am
Location: West London

Postby scottywong » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:12 pm

cheers. any one know if any more reliability problems with the higher power stuff?


scotty
scottywong
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby thunderider » Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:24 pm

ive got a 90 ps mk6,i too do courier/light haulage,it struggles up hill loaded but once back on the flat itll do 90 loaded,basically botom end is crap,but once the turbo spins in there ok,probably could do with a dump vale :D ,but if you can get a 125/120 ps go for that,remember if you find a jumbo it will only carry 1300kg,as the lwb will carry 1500kg
I am the god of hell fire.....
User avatar
thunderider
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:14 pm
Location: birmingham


Return to Buyers Guide



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.