which is best for fuel economy?
based on same spec van ie lwb 350 etc,
*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*
fwd or rwd
Moderator: Luke
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
fwd or rwd
by macinavan » Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:12 pm
- macinavan
- Transit Addict
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:01 pm
Re: fwd or rwd
by Daveyboy » Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:09 pm
I'm not 100% sure but I'd guess it would be the FWD version.
- Daveyboy
- Transit Aficionado
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:39 pm
Re: fwd or rwd
by chopper123 » Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:27 pm
wouldnt of thought it would have made much of a diferance
learn something every day
learn something every day
- chopper123
- Transit Devotee
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:33 am
- Location: telford midlands
Re: fwd or rwd
by Mike » Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:39 pm
Lighter, less friction in the transmission, more aerodynamic, nothing huge but it all adds up.
- Mike
- Wind up merchant!
- Posts: 19592
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:08 pm
- Location: HP17 0UZ
Re: fwd or rwd
by sc_BK » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:25 pm
I thought the only LWB FWD you could get was the 280, maybe 300?
-
sc_BK - Remapped by Vantuner
- Posts: 6100
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:14 am
- Location: Ross Shire............. Transit: Mk7 LWB
Re: fwd or rwd
by Guy88 » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:40 pm
sc_BK wrote:I thought the only LWB FWD you could get was the 280, maybe 300?
Nope, i know were theres a MWB 350 luton, and a LWB 350 recovery, both 125 TDci's
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44
REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD
LIVIN' LOUD
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44
REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD
LIVIN' LOUD
-
Guy88 - Site Moderator
- Posts: 17042
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:37 pm
- Location: Banbury, oxon
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users