FredTransit wrote:You reminded me about rust and the lack of Mk2s on the road (well not my road obviously...)
the lack of mk 2's is not just rust, most of them got exported, people were snapping them up to ship abroad
FredTransit wrote:You reminded me about rust and the lack of Mk2s on the road (well not my road obviously...)


So why do your cars have so much rust over there?


madmark wrote::) and dont forget most people excludeing fredwant newer vans for there work not older!


Granadadriver wrote:madmark wrote::) and dont forget most people excludeing fredwant newer vans for there work not older!
I'd go for a MK1, MK2 or MK3 for work, too! Because they're more reliable than newer ones and easier to fix, too! Too many electronics in newer ones! And less capacity with too much hp: That's not good for an engine which should last long!











Stout lout wrote:I purchased my van because of image.I am self employed and visit customers addresses every day.A good clean ,tidy ,presentable van goes a long way for repeat business.Right or wrong the paying public do notice the age of the van you are running.
Also touch wood my van has been totally trouble free in the two years i have owned it.Not a single fault.
I am not saying there is anything wrong with older vans either .My last Transit was a 1988 transit 80 with a 2 litre pinto and i made that last 10years.I loved that van.It just got too rusty and untidy for public work.


Return to Members Transit's - Progress Reports!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.