transitgeoff wrote:you think im gonna be able to live on a diet of black pudding![]()
![]()
better than jellied eels
transitgeoff wrote:you think im gonna be able to live on a diet of black pudding![]()
![]()


0-60 in 5.3 secondstransitgeoff wrote:400 horses what info have you there




transitgeoff wrote:s type r4.2 wiv 6 speed zf box auto of course
(transit eater
) well most car eater
(not all i know but most
)


Luke wrote:been thinking about the mounts as thats the job i need to do next - the vibratecnics stuff is expensive and if i knew it would be ok i'd buy some but i just dont know![]()
i like the idea of the wcxm idea because it cant split and allow the engine to move but buy the nature of its design there isnt much contact spread on the rubber so i guess thats why you'll always get a harsh ride![]()
i'm thinking of using matts idea of 2 mounts - the standard one to take the weight of the engine and cushion is and a 2nd one to hold it down and conteract the engine as the power is applied - basically to stop the origanal mount splitting in 2
these are a few sketches to show ith idea - A or C are my favorite![]()




Luke wrote:now you tell me![]()
i'll have to see how i get on with these ones ive done - i must admit they seem a lot less flexable than the pinto ones


hope sooldskooler wrote:but i dont think you ill have any vibrations with a straight six, should be sweet as a nut.![]()
oldskooler wrote:torsional strength will be most important for launching hard i imagine.
Luke wrote:hope sooldskooler wrote:but i dont think you ill have any vibrations with a straight six, should be sweet as a nut.![]()
oldskooler wrote:torsional strength will be most important for launching hard i imagine.
i was thinking of making some solid mounts that i can swap for the tracki think you could change the mounts with a spanner and a trolley jack in 15mins




Return to Members Transit's - Progress Reports!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.