*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


mk2 camper

Transit Mk1 & 2 Forum. All Transits 1965 - 1986

Moderator: Luke

mk2 camper

Postby elx317t » Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:07 pm

hi all sorry to bother you again just need a bit of advise i have a mk2 camper and there is enough room to carry 7 people in the back but there is no seat belts i have three kids 0ne 9 one 7 and the other 5 will i need to fit seat belts
elx317t
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:42 pm

Re: mk2 camper

Postby FredTransit » Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:20 pm

currently no, you don't have to. The bad news is the seats in the back of campers aren't really meant for carrying people in the back, they are for sitting on when you are stationary. Technically though side facing seats don't currently need seat belts to pass the MOT, so it's a bit of a grey area. I did read that at some point in the future campers will need rear seat belts, but don't know when.
A Transit is for life, not just for Christmas. http://www.a2ecommercials.webs.com
My galleries - http://a2ecommercials.webs.com/apps/photos/
User avatar
FredTransit
Mk2 Trannyist
 
Posts: 17470
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:34 am
Location: London

Re: mk2 camper

Postby elx317t » Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:30 pm

so i could get f++++d if i get cought with anyone in the back
elx317t
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:42 pm

Re: mk2 camper

Postby Wolfie » Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:40 pm

the youngest must be belted, so they would have to sit in the front. As to campers and seat belt it is for new vehicles only. side facing seats are regarded as bad news with a belt, puts the strain on the wrong areas of the body in a crash. 7 people Plus gear and your will be at weight limit nearly if not already over it. but i dont get five in mine and as long as they sit still and behave you should not have too much of a problem
1979 2L pinto camper
Wolfie
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: herts

Re: mk2 camper

Postby FredTransit » Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:45 pm

I didn't realise there was any rules at all yet regarding campers.
A Transit is for life, not just for Christmas. http://www.a2ecommercials.webs.com
My galleries - http://a2ecommercials.webs.com/apps/photos/
User avatar
FredTransit
Mk2 Trannyist
 
Posts: 17470
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:34 am
Location: London

Re: mk2 camper

Postby PJR » Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:55 pm

i've just done an article on this...

Side facing seats do not need seatbelts, in fact it is considered slightly more dangerous for seatbelts to be fitted due to the frontal impact and direction of travel of the body. However - you can fit lapbelts if needed - they are a bit of work and need professional fitting, there's a company called Towtal who can do this. Children MUST be secured.

However, you can easily fit seatbelts to forward facing seats. Modern motorhomes feature 'travel seats' in the rear which are effectivally the sofa's with 3-point belts and / or lapbelts fitted.

One final bit of advice. While you don't need seatbelts to carry adults in side facing seats, it could possibly invalidate your insurance in case of an accident, if you are carrying passengers who are not belted up in the rear.

Hope this helps!
PJR
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:00 pm

Re: mk2 camper

Postby elx317t » Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:18 pm

cheers all now im a bit stuffed im supposed to be taking them out tomorow the kids love the van and they cant wait i always thought it the belts was not factory fitted they didnt need them
elx317t
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:42 pm

Re: mk2 camper

Postby comet » Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:24 pm

Image
1971 LANDLINER - 2.5DI FITTED NEW BY FORDS IN 2000 - IF YOU WANT A COVER UP ASK THE POLICE THEY ARE THE BEST
comet
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:07 pm
Location: BLACKBURN/DARWEN-LANCASHIRE

Re: mk2 camper

Postby elx317t » Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:28 pm

sorry mate what does that mean
elx317t
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:42 pm

Re: mk2 camper

Postby Luke » Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:37 pm

elx317t wrote:so i could get f++++d if i get cought with anyone in the back
nah you'll prolly just get a lecture and told not to do it again :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44558
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Re: mk2 camper

Postby FredTransit » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:31 pm

elx317t wrote:sorry mate what does that mean



That pic (and it's small and difficult to read) looks like an email from VOSA to Comet. I reads

"If your vehicle weighs no mere than 2540kg unladen then a belt that restrains the upper part of the body is required for the driver and specified front passenger seat. If your vehicle is over the weight threshold unladen, there is no seatbelt requirement."

Bear in mind, Comet has a rax exempt (pre 1973) landliner, so it may not apply to your camper.

I am with Luke on this, I bet the police will either not know or do nothing.
A Transit is for life, not just for Christmas. http://www.a2ecommercials.webs.com
My galleries - http://a2ecommercials.webs.com/apps/photos/
User avatar
FredTransit
Mk2 Trannyist
 
Posts: 17470
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:34 am
Location: London

Re: mk2 camper

Postby wannamk2 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:19 am

see if http://www.childcarseats.org.uk helps with any answers

here's a quote taken from there:

'The law will be changing in May 2009 to prevent the carrage of more passengers than there are seat belts, and the exact details of this law will be announced by the Department for Transport closer to the time'

and if I understand this right, it means ALL campers any age.
wannamk2
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:53 pm


Return to Mk 1 & 2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.