*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Transit Mk1 & 2 Forum. All Transits 1965 - 1986

Moderator: Luke

Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby travellinggirl » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:57 pm

I might be going to view a Mk 1 coachbuilt thats had a 3.1 V6 engine put in..
Can anyone tell me about this type of engine? Im assuming that it drinks lots of petrol???!! The person hasnt mentioned whether its petrol or diesel, but i know its manual.

Also, the guy wants to keep the number plates when the vans sold - what happens next?

Thanks a lot!
Emma
travellinggirl
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:31 pm

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby Luke » Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:54 pm

is it MOT'd :?:
as it needs to be to transfer the plate off - other than that shouldn't be a problem :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44557
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby andrew-v8 » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:17 am

You are the weakest link GOODBYE!
User avatar
andrew-v8
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:32 pm

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby crackers » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:21 am

yes petrol engine and will sup the juice like no tomorrow :!:
nice van though if its the same one
crackers
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:12 pm
Location: east side

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby travellinggirl » Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:08 am

Thanks all..

I cant really afford to keep it running if it drinks like im assuming it will as its going to be my only vehicle.. my current camper does about 19mpg and thats hard enough!

Would there be any way around this? Im wondering how much it might cost for me to source another engine,pay for a garage to take this one out and drop a transit diesel engine in?
Any ideas?

Oh, yes by the way, it is the one on ebay - it looks lovely!!!
travellinggirl
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:31 pm

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby crackers » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:27 am

madmark will be along soon to tell you what mpg it does :lol: shame as it sounds like a good engine and the van looks mint 8)
crackers
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:12 pm
Location: east side

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby madmark » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:42 am

:lol: it looks a cracker!
mpg will be if you drive sencible there is a good chance you will get 15-18mpg ,as the engine wont be working hard, if it was a 2ltr it would be the same! if you were to change the engine to diesel it would be noisey and very heavy on the steering!
looks nice and its had alot of money put into it!
if you go and look make shure you check for damp in the top bed area! :wink:
madmark
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:29 am

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby foggy08 » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:17 pm

i would keep the v6 if i were you..ive a mk2 camper 2.5 diesel twin wheeler and you are constantly driving foot to the floor in every gear .and top speed 55-60 on the flat and its embaracing on the hills.
ouch ..suarez bit my finger
User avatar
foggy08
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: midlothian

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby madmark » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm

i agree foggy! :wink:
madmark
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:29 am

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby travellinggirl » Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:09 pm

OH :oops: So do you mean that even with a 2.5 diesel engine i'll only get around 15-18mpg if i take it easy??? Is a diesel engine heavier in general, than a petrol?
Oh dear..im not doing very well here. :roll:


...Madmark,,did it used to be your van?? :shock:
travellinggirl
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:31 pm

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby madmark » Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:50 pm

no it wasnt my van, the diesel will be about 30mpg but ,what you have to work out is the cost to get it fitted and also buy a engine!this would cost a fair bit ,that works out alot of petrol you could have used! :wink:
the diesel engine will make the steering very heavy to move ,myself i would leave the v6 petrol in there ! :wink:
madmark
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:29 am

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby Neil » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:22 pm

v6 driven right should return 20 24 mpg and its cheaper than diesal,no noise,no smelly smoke and cheap on spares,if you dont buy that someone will ,proper thing
Neil v6
Neil
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 5:09 pm
Location: Preston

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby madmark » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:38 pm

wow neil are you ok ? your only saying that as its got a essex v6! :lol: :lol:
biut i agree buy it buy it! :wink:
madmark
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:29 am

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby bron y aur » Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:34 pm

Buy it and i bet you'l end up keeping the v6 :).
i started with nothing, still have most of it left
bron y aur
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:10 pm
Location: nott's

Re: Tranist mk 1 coachbuilt with 3.1 V6 engine??

Postby chipv8 » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:05 pm

Di's aren't that good MPGwise anyway. Mine never returned more than 20 mpg despite a propper good service and check over (although servicing improved it a lot!). I worked out that I could swap a rover v8 from a Range Rover and still run the van for the same kind of cost per week. Given the ever increasing gap in the cost of diesel and petrol you'd probably be aswell off in the more powerfull quieter petrol, and being a v6 it will have plenty of grunt for shifting its weight compared to a pinto 4 Cylinder.
Back In the Black Country!!
User avatar
chipv8
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Back in Tipton

Next

Return to Mk 1 & 2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.