*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


Power gains by a re map

Transit Mk6 & Mk7 Forum. All Transits 2000 - 2013

Power gains by a re map

Postby Dale1970 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:47 am

I am under the impression and also been told by other people that the MK7 TDCI 2.2 is the same engine right through the range from 85ps - 140ps this is the puma euro4 engine.

All that is different is the 130ps & 140ps the turbo as an electric actuator instead of the vacuum and software settings in ECU. I don't know if the injectors are the same.

But the inside workings of the engine is the same. So why do Fords give them such a wide range of power and also set the power toque so low 85ps to so high 140ps.

My transit as been re-mapped from 85ps to a suspected 148ps it as been tested but others say the dyno it was tested is not that accurate.

I know when you contact these companies they tell you what you want hear. So this thread really is all about what have you got power wise from your transit 2.2 or 2.4.

Please forgive me if I am wrong on the information given at the top I pay guys to sort this out but after hearing so many different storeys I am not sure now. I am not a mechanic I know a little about a lot really in this field.
Transit MK7 SWB MID ROOF 85PS 56 PLATE RE MAPPED & EGR Removed
Transit MK6 LWB MID ROOF 75PS 2000 X
Transit MK5 SWB MID ROOF 1996 P

http://www.incarsoundandsecurity.co.uk
User avatar
Dale1970
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:11 pm
Location: Dartford Kent

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby ake » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:04 pm

The 85 and 110 ps have lower flow injectors than the others, and I would imagine that there will be internal differences such as cam profiles
2024 Ford Transit Custom 300S Active 170ps Auto
2013 Ford Fiesta Van 95ps
If she knew what she wants
ake
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 41846
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:19 pm
Location: The fair city o' Perth

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby loot » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:05 pm

I think martyn would be best answering this from a remap point of view.
maybe a tech could explain the physical differences in the engines.
I think the electronic control of thre higher ps turbos maybe to decrease lag response since they don't need to wait for vacuum pressure too build up,similarly too a super charger over a turbo charger where it being direct drive means more response.
boss man is getting his van remapped on Monday, I assume the bloke it's using kess to do it,will see what happens.
:o
56 350 2.2 130ps mk7 with 2 side doors 8)
65 290 2.2 125ps custom with 2 side doors 8)
07 350 170ps
Ids v86 licence + v86.04 update + xprog here
Ids map here
User avatar
loot
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 34185
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 6:06 pm
Location: North Wales

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby fedup2 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:01 pm

First,I think 148 Bhp from a 85 is wishful thinking at its best.

The 85 and 110 share a lot of the same parts including weedy driveshafts and joints but the 130 and above have much bigger ones and of course the injectors and turbo are different.wether or not the cam profile is different I wouldn't know but I doubt it.I suspect alot of the difference is in the software but injectors,and turbo is going to limit that.
Launch x431 owner ;)
fedup2
Transit Fanatic
Transit Fanatic
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Nr Doncaster

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Dale1970 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:14 pm

fedup2 wrote:First,I think 148 Bhp from a 85 is wishful thinking at its best.

The 85 and 110 share a lot of the same parts including weedy driveshafts and joints but the 130 and above have much bigger ones and of course the injectors and turbo are different.wether or not the cam profile is different I wouldn't know but I doubt it.I suspect alot of the difference is in the software but injectors,and turbo is going to limit that.


A ford techy told me the actual engine components are the same eg: cams, followers, pistons, cranks, heads & valves as this is the standard set up for the 2.2 the power difference is in the turbo and software set up. The clutch and drive gear is different as you say, I got that info from a ford tech at our local dealers. You say that it is wishful thinking to get 148 out of a 85ps why.

I see ( correct if you think I am wrong) but if you had software restricting the power of that unit and to boost the power up you only have to change the perimeters of the settings. The 130 can go up to 160ish by altering the same settings why can't you get 148 out of the 85. It as the same diesel injector, used through the 85, 110, 115 & 130 range it is also used in the Jag 2.2, Range rover sport also Mondeo. So I cant see that the injector will restrict the velocity and pressure of diesel going through it and same diesel pump. I take it if you wanted to you can re-map the 130 down to a 85ps not that you want to but the perimeters are there to do so :roll:
Transit MK7 SWB MID ROOF 85PS 56 PLATE RE MAPPED & EGR Removed
Transit MK6 LWB MID ROOF 75PS 2000 X
Transit MK5 SWB MID ROOF 1996 P

http://www.incarsoundandsecurity.co.uk
User avatar
Dale1970
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:11 pm
Location: Dartford Kent

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Guy88 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:09 pm

Injectors are different in the 85 and 110,

When my 110 was mapped it caused no end of problems when going for high power gains,

the 115, 130 and 140ps 2.2 has higher flowing injectors, many people on here have got a juddering from the 110 because the injectors are so close to their limit,

if you go into ford and compare them the injectors are different, fuel rail PRV is different etc,

Its basically like having 2 pipes with the same pressure but 2 different sizes, the bigger one will allow more to pass thru in the same time.
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44

REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD

LIVIN' LOUD
User avatar
Guy88
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 17042
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Banbury, oxon

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Dale1970 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:41 pm

There are 3 types of injector Denso part No. 6C1Q-9K546-AC FINIS: 1378432 This does 85, 110 115 120ps and Denso part No 095000-7060 (6C1Q9K546-BB) 130 & 140ps. There is a SIEMENS injector but not sure what for. That's what I just read :roll:

http://www.mondeospares.co.uk/ford-transit-mk7-2224-tdci-denso-injector-reconditioned-2006---onwards-6c1q-9k546-ac-1722-p.asp
Transit MK7 SWB MID ROOF 85PS 56 PLATE RE MAPPED & EGR Removed
Transit MK6 LWB MID ROOF 75PS 2000 X
Transit MK5 SWB MID ROOF 1996 P

http://www.incarsoundandsecurity.co.uk
User avatar
Dale1970
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:11 pm
Location: Dartford Kent

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Guy88 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:07 pm

Dale1970 wrote:There are 3 types of injector Denso part No. 6C1Q-9K546-AC FINIS: 1378432 This does 85, 110 115 120ps and Denso part No 095000-7060 (6C1Q9K546-BB) 130 & 140ps. There is a SIEMENS injector but not sure what for. That's what I just read :roll:

http://www.mondeospares.co.uk/ford-transit-mk7-2224-tdci-denso-injector-reconditioned-2006---onwards-6c1q-9k546-ac-1722-p.asp



that is for the 85 and 110ps 2.2 and the 100 and 115ps 2.4, they never made a 120ps MK7

the ones ending in AC are low flow the ones ending in BB are high flow

AFAIK all the MK7 have denso injectors

the 110ps seemed to cause a lot of running issues when tuned, ford discontinued the 110 2.2 and fitted the 115ps 2.2 with the BB injectors in it, these cause a lot less issues

The fact that the 110 causes issues even with a mild tune is making the 140ps from an 85 seem a bit optimistic,

the 110 wouldnt get anywhere near 140ps without issues
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44

REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD

LIVIN' LOUD
User avatar
Guy88
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 17042
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Banbury, oxon

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Guy88 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:08 pm

siemens injectors are for the connect btw :wink:
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44

REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD

LIVIN' LOUD
User avatar
Guy88
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 17042
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Banbury, oxon

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Dale1970 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:22 pm

I have just found this on here they was told the same as me but had it dyno tested and only got it to 137ps.
He was originally told 157ps
http://fordtransit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=56783&start=15
Last edited by Dale1970 on Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Transit MK7 SWB MID ROOF 85PS 56 PLATE RE MAPPED & EGR Removed
Transit MK6 LWB MID ROOF 75PS 2000 X
Transit MK5 SWB MID ROOF 1996 P

http://www.incarsoundandsecurity.co.uk
User avatar
Dale1970
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:11 pm
Location: Dartford Kent

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Rumble bee » Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:28 pm

Tempted to get mine on a dyno, theres one down the road from me.

Mines a mapped 110, be interested to see what power it is :?:


Chris
Image
User avatar
Rumble bee
Transit Fanatic
Transit Fanatic
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby g-man » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:43 pm

they also say a 110 connect will go to 148bhp :lol:
User avatar
g-man
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 12458
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Matlock.....ish

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby ake » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:18 pm

g-man wrote:they also say a 110 connect will go to 148bhp :lol:

I bet that's reliable :lol:
2024 Ford Transit Custom 300S Active 170ps Auto
2013 Ford Fiesta Van 95ps
If she knew what she wants
ake
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 41846
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:19 pm
Location: The fair city o' Perth

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby Wadey » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:00 pm

Iv kinda come to this half way through and was gonna ask the question later but now seems a good enough time sorry if iv hijacted someones thread ! Iv currently got a 90 that if like to get more power are the injectors smaller on the 90s? The block has just had new rings shells etc I'm gonna get the pump and injectors checked am I better off putting different ones in than having the originals refurbed? If I want more power? I know I'm gonna need a re map so is it worth upgrading the bits before? and has anyone ever had the heads played with? As mines off at the moment sorry for so many questions
just follow the onscreen instructions and it's fairly idiot proof...trouble is, we keep producing better idiots
Wadey
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 1602
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:17 pm
Location: Plymouth

Re: Power gains by a re map

Postby alzee20 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:21 pm

My scientific input-
I had a 75ps mk6 swb low roof, I now have a 11 plate 115 ps mk7 the same size carrying the same stuff around..
My 75ps had an inter cooler put on, de cat and kn panel filter, remapped by van tuner twice.. ( the 2nd time was after increasing turbo with a bleed type valve).
I had my mk7 from brand new, my mk6 had just that bit more power, she burned a lot more diesel though! Lol
I'd say now that she was nearly at 120 ps.. I did keep up with a mates 125 empty jumbo...
mk7 280 115ps swb fwb lr - 20000 miles so far..!
mk6 280 75ps swb fwd lr - Dead but took a sprinter with her! :)
mk6 280 75ps swb fwd lr - Vantunered!
alzee20
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Stansted Essex

Next

Return to Mk6 & Mk7 - Third Generation Transits



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Luke, Majestic-12 [Bot]

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.