Ford Transit Forum

by **Luke** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:51 pm

Neil wrote:only a 1.6 what a poor effort

thats what i thought - why not at least a 2.0 :roll:

by **madmark** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:41 am

it was at the time the new lc kent powerd swb came out !

i would of had the 2ltr v4 option myself as the lc kent was a crap engine for the transit imo

by **Granadadriver** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:01 pm

madmark wrote:it was at the time the new lc kent powerd swb came out ! i would of had the 2ltr v4 option myself as the lc kent was a crap engine for the transit imo

Were factory MK1 Kents flat fronts?

by **Luke** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:09 pm

Granadadriver wrote:Were factory MK1 Kents flat fronts?

yeah my mate had one in a camper

by **Granadadriver** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:28 pm

Manythanks, Luke!

by **madmark** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:06 am

stefan in 1976 they were 1.6 kent and 2ltr v4 was a option and not standard fit , they still fitted in the flat front no problem! and gave 65ps i think the same as your v4 engines!

i dont think the germans had the kent in the swb did they???? also in the first mk2 they were kent powerd as well in 1978! :wink:

by **Granadadriver** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:38 pm

Thanks Mark!

You're right: We never had Kent-equipped MK1's and MK2's! That's why I never saw one and I thought all MK1's with straight 4 engines had the diesel front! :lol: