*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


302cu (5litre) Windsor into a Transit?

Post all custom related threads here!

Moderator: Luke

302cu (5litre) Windsor into a Transit?

Postby V8alltheway » Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:13 am

I am keen to start a little(!) project and like the idea of dropping a 302cu Windsor into a Transit. I've searched the forum and seen that it has been done but can't find any info about doing it.

I've seen Sundowner's work in progress but the guy is obviously a genius whereas I am a complete muppet! (I think the 460 is just a little bit bigger than a 302 anyway :shock: ).

I'd be grateful if anyone could answer the following questions:

1. How much work to the firewall is needed to get the engine in?

2. I'd go for the auto transmission (C4?)... would the tunnel need modifying too?

3. Would the engine mounts need to be fabricated or does anyone sell 'em?

4. Apart from brakes, suspension, propshaft (I'm guessing this would have to be specially made), bigger fuel tank and rear axle (narrowed 9"?), what else would need doing? (I'd be running carbs).

5. Are Mk2s rare (expensive!) nowadays? If so, would go for a Mk3 or later.

Any help would be much appreciated. Still at the planning stages at the moment but in about 10 years... :lol:
V8alltheway
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:50 pm

Re: 302cu (5litre) Windsor into a Transit?

Postby rover » Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:43 am

V8alltheway wrote:I am keen to start a little(!) project and like the idea of dropping a 302cu Windsor into a Transit. I've searched the forum and seen that it has been done but can't find any info about doing it.

I've seen Sundowner's work in progress but the guy is obviously a genius whereas I am a complete muppet! (I think the 460 is just a little bit bigger than a 302 anyway :shock: ).

I'd be grateful if anyone could answer the following questions:

1. How much work to the firewall is needed to get the engine in?

2. I'd go for the auto transmission (C4?)... would the tunnel need modifying too?

3. Would the engine mounts need to be fabricated or does anyone sell 'em?

4. Apart from brakes, suspension, propshaft (I'm guessing this would have to be specially made), bigger fuel tank and rear axle (narrowed 9"?), what else would need doing? (I'd be running carbs).

5. Are Mk2s rare (expensive!) nowadays? If so, would go for a Mk3 or later.

Any help would be much appreciated. Still at the planning stages at the moment but in about 10 years... :lol:


Lets do this in reverse order then...

Mk2's are getting rarer but they are still around, for a good one (not a lot of tinworm) you would be paying a grand+, they do have a little more room for a bigger engine although a bulkhead mod would still need doing to fit a 302 I would think.
The front suspension is not independant but if that bothers you it can be done (ckeck out Lukes thread on fitting IFS to a Mk1)

If you went for a later Mk3/4/5 SWB they have IFS and good brakes anyway so that would not need any mods other than possibly stronger springs.

Engine mounts would need fabricating.

I would suggest a borgwarner auto box, I dont think the A4LD (you said C4 but the A4LD is the successor of the C3) would take the amount of torque a 302 would put through it, I wouldnt have thought any tunnel mods were needed as there is plenty of room.

IF you do use a MK2 then a bigger fuel tank is probably a good idea, mk3 onwards has a 68litre tank anyway, even with a 302 you should see over 200 miles to a tankfull.

Rover.
User avatar
rover
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:03 am
Location: Nottinghamshire

Postby Sundowner » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:59 pm

Firstly are you in the Uk or aus?

Dimentions of a 302w
weight> 460bs

width> 24"

length> 29"

height> 27.5"

i dont know what the euro spec engine mounts look like but new items will be needed

trans tunnel will remain untouched with a C4 (or a 16 speed road ranger) theres heaps of room, you can use the transit diff fuel tank and propshaft though you will need to get the C4 yolk fitted to it

You will need to mod the firewall this can be easy if you dont want a removable cover
Yeah i know its big green and rusty so move your Porsche before i bash it with 460 cubes of fords finest cast iron
User avatar
Sundowner
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:01 pm

Postby V8alltheway » Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:09 pm

Thanks for your replies! It looks like I might actually be able to do this.

Any further advice would be much appreciated (esp. an idea as to how much it would cost for someone else to do the bulkhead mods).

I'm in England (Bristol).

Cheers
V8alltheway
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:50 pm

Re: 302cu (5litre) Windsor into a Transit?

Postby Luke » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:39 pm

V8alltheway wrote:5. Are Mk2s rare (expensive!) nowadays? If so, would go for a Mk3 or later
as much as i love mk2's finding a good one theses days (in the UK) will be difficult :( i'd be inclined to go for a mk3/4/5 :)
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby WRECKERSTEVE » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:55 am

just got a latest copy of the mag doing the v8 conversion and i think they are using similar engine some good pics
you break it i take it
WRECKERSTEVE
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:25 am
Location: cornwall

Postby Aragorn » Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:53 am

by 'the mag' i assume u mean practical performance car?

ive not seen the lastest issue, i'll get it next week, but they had a ford modular v8 from a new mustang, similar to the 302/351 but with overhead cams and other newer features

last months issue did seem to suggest it was going to be a nightmare to fit so perhaps they've changed the engine?
Aragorn
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: 302cu (5litre) Windsor into a Transit?

Postby Granadadriver » Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:00 pm

Luke wrote:
V8alltheway wrote:5. Are Mk2s rare (expensive!) nowadays? If so, would go for a Mk3 or later
as much as i love mk2's finding a good one theses days (in the UK) will be difficult :( i'd be inclined to go for a mk3/4/5 :)


In case of MK2s, Germany's again the place to go for! :D OK, less panel vans here, but lots of (nearly) rust free SWB minibuses and LWB srw ambulances! They're waiting to be converted back into a panel van! 8)
User avatar
Granadadriver
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:35 pm
Location: Osnabruck, Germany

Postby V8alltheway » Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:32 am

Sundowner wrote:Dimentions of a 302w
weight> 460bs

width> 24"

length> 29"

height> 27.5"

You will need to mod the firewall this can be easy if you dont want a removable cover


I've spent hours reading the 24v conversion posts and it seems that this would be more work than fitting a carbed V8. (Hats off to you guys! You're an inspiration!)

Please correct me if I'm wrong but the only major work to do for a V8 would be engine mounts, radiator and exhausts... all of which (and more) seem to be a hassle with the 24v.

Could anyone tell me, based on the engine dimensions above and taking into account the bigger rad/gbox, how much I am going to have to mod the firewall and is it just a case of whacking it with a lumphammer? :twisted:

(BTW Going to go for a Mk3/4/5 for the IFS and cost reasons. Will buy the mag tomorrow! I'd want a RHD van but cheers for the tip about Germany!)

Thanks!
V8alltheway
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:50 pm

Postby Luke » Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:53 am

V8alltheway wrote:Please correct me if I'm wrong but the only major work to do for a V8 would be engine mounts, radiator and exhausts... all of which (and more) seem to be a hassle with the 24v.
i think your about right - certanly the electrical side would be easier than 24v

sump clearance with x/member and rack would be something to check especially the rack column :!: also if you want a PAS rack the pipes come in to the top - they caused me a minor problem :)

not sure on the tunnel - there isnt much of one on a transit but i think you would be ok :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby V8alltheway » Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:26 am

Luke wrote:sump clearance with x/member and rack would be something to check especially the rack column :!: also if you want a PAS rack the pipes come in to the top - they caused me a minor problem :)

not sure on the tunnel - there isnt much of one on a transit but i think you would be ok :D


Just had a quick look on t'internet and found a company that sells all kinds of sumps so, touch wood, that shouldn't be a major issue.

If the steering gets in the way at all, do you have any ideas how I could get round this? I'll be getting aluminium heads to save weight and I'm hoping I won't need PAS... one more thing to go wrong!

Sorry for all the questions but I really want to make sure this is "do-able" before I start throwing money at it and I am most definitely what you would call an amateur!
V8alltheway
Transit Fan
Transit Fan
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:50 pm

Postby Luke » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:45 am

i think you'll find the rack will be ok :? :lol: - just something to check :D for example with the 24v cossy the oil filter/cooler is right in the way :!:

like you say if you can get different sumps then thats a bonus, when i was putting the rover engine in my mk1 escort i wanted it as low as possable so what i did was took the sump off, mounted the engine in a position where the crank didnt touch the crossmember then modified the standard sump to suit :idea:

as far as "do-able" - i'll measure up my mk4 to see if you can get the engine in but i'd be pritty sure it can be done :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby Luke » Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:04 am

right just had a measure :D

Its a big bugger :lol: i'd say the biggest problem would be the width and catching on the rack/ column :? not sure how the measurements work but if it was a square box of that size it would have to be fitted very high up :( but i'd guess they are max dimentions so thats gonna be at the heads. could do with a front on shot of the engine - see what you can get and post it here :D

as far as the other dimentions it will go in but bulkhead mods would be needed - best way would be when fitting it - jack it up and as bits of the bulkhead are in the way chop them out, eventually you would end up with it in position and then copying sundowner make a neat cover :D or just plate the holes over :D the good thing about the transit is that space taken up is not used so no loss :D

what would you be using the van for :?:
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby Luke » Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:12 am

one more thing the rear axle might need swapping - the transit ratio might not be suitable and it might be too weak :(

but your best doing what i'm doing - get it running iron out all minor problems then swap the axle later - it will also give you a better idea of the ratio you need having driven the van with the engine/box combo in it :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby Sundowner » Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:19 am

windsor pic

Image

can someone get me a pic of a mk3 bay minus engine?
Yeah i know its big green and rusty so move your Porsche before i bash it with 460 cubes of fords finest cast iron
User avatar
Sundowner
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:01 pm

Next

Return to Customising and one offs



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.