*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


Mk1 and 2 independant front suspension conversion!

Post all custom related threads here!

Moderator: Luke

Postby Sundowner » Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:42 am

carnut1100 wrote: Vented discs with 5x112 PCD too.........


What discs are you running on your van
Yeah i know its big green and rusty so move your Porsche before i bash it with 460 cubes of fords finest cast iron
User avatar
Sundowner
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:01 pm

Postby MrMPuk » Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:01 am

carnut1100 wrote:What years are Mk3s? I know bugger all about anything post-Mk2.


http://www.fordtransit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2635
MrMPuk
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 27856
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:50 am

Postby Luke » Thu Jun 21, 2007 1:19 pm

one thing i did think of although mk1/2 hubs will fit on mk3 front end - im not sure how it will be re. caliper clearance - but if you redrill you can machine the edge down to get the caliper clearance as sundowner has done with his :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby carnut1100 » Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:32 am

I'm running Ford Falcon XY ( 1971 ) discs which have separate hubs, but the conversion works with other Falcon discs with the integral hubs, although a small step has to be turned in the back of the hub to clear the backplate bolt heads. i had a set of XC discs to do the conversion, but swapped them for a set of XY ones so I didn't have to get them machined.
I used Castlemaine Rod Shop kit, but if I was doing it again I would just measure up the stuff on the car and make it myself, as it is a piece of cake. There is a caliper bracket ( for Holden HQ calipers) , a shrink fit spacer to pack the disc at the correct distance, and the bolts and washers etc. The kit cost $150 about 6 or 7 years ago, and the conversion took an afternoon in total.
The Transit bearings fit straight into the Falcon hubs and the brake hoses screw straight in, but it is a good idea to get some longer ones made, as they tend to rub on the shocks a little. Long term this is not a good idea.

So, if a Mk1 hub will fit on a mK3 front end then my kit should fit also, and give me Falcon stud pattern on IFS with minimum messing around, as this conversion looks MUCH easier than widening a Holden front end and making it fit, which was one option I was considering......
1979 Mk2 Truck Project thread here
User avatar
carnut1100
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:18 am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Postby Sundowner » Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:58 am

carnut1100 wrote:I'm running Ford Falcon XY ( 1971 ) discs which have separate hubs, but the conversion works with other Falcon discs with the integral hubs, although a small step has to be turned in the back of the hub to clear the backplate bolt heads. i had a set of XC discs to do the conversion, but swapped them for a set of XY ones so I didn't have to get them machined.
I used Castlemaine Rod Shop kit, but if I was doing it again I would just measure up the stuff on the car and make it myself, as it is a piece of cake. There is a caliper bracket ( for Holden HQ calipers) , a shrink fit spacer to pack the disc at the correct distance, and the bolts and washers etc. The kit cost $150 about 6 or 7 years ago, and the conversion took an afternoon in total.
The Transit bearings fit straight into the Falcon hubs and the brake hoses screw straight in, but it is a good idea to get some longer ones made, as they tend to rub on the shocks a little. Long term this is not a good idea.

So, if a Mk1 hub will fit on a mK3 front end then my kit should fit also, and give me Falcon stud pattern on IFS with minimum messing around, as this conversion looks MUCH easier than widening a Holden front end and making it fit, which was one option I was considering......


Yeah i thought you said it has a falc conversion its the same kit when fitting falc discs to TE cortina

It just threw my when you said you had 5x112
Yeah i know its big green and rusty so move your Porsche before i bash it with 460 cubes of fords finest cast iron
User avatar
Sundowner
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:01 pm

Postby carnut1100 » Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:00 am

Falcon PCD is 5x112 isn't it?

The other option for fitting the hubs to a Mk4 front end is to look in a bearing catalogue, as I am sure there would be a bearing that would tie the early hubs to the later spindle.
Is the Mk4 spindle larger or smaller than the Mk1/2?

I have been asking around, and I can get a complete front end minus discs and calipers for around $5-600 plus shipping, but Mk4s are FAR esier to find, and parts for them are also easier and cheaper. It looks like I might be going the Mk4 way and trying to fit the Falcon hubs onto that.
If the later spindle is smaller than a simple shrink fit sleeve would do the job, but if it is larger than the spindle would need turning down, or a suitable bearing needs to be found. I think the bearing would be easier.
1979 Mk2 Truck Project thread here
User avatar
carnut1100
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:18 am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Postby Luke » Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:08 pm

carnut1100 wrote:The other option for fitting the hubs to a Mk4 front end is to look in a bearing catalogue, as I am sure there would be a bearing that would tie the early hubs to the later spindle.
i think the probelm is one is metric one is imperial - i had a look and couldnt find anything - but i didnt try that hard as even mk1 hubs on mine would be too wide!
the other option is to have mk4 hubs redrilled - coincidently ive been working on a mk4 redrill just this morning :shock: and i'll update my progress on here :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby carnut1100 » Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:45 am

Does anyone know the sizes?
It would be a simple matter to turn a sleeve with a metric inner diameter and an imperial outer diameter and use the bearing with the next larger size inner.
Make the sleeve 4 thou undersize and shrink fit it. Works a treat.
1979 Mk2 Truck Project thread here
User avatar
carnut1100
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:18 am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Postby Luke » Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:22 am

carnut1100 wrote:Does anyone know the sizes?
It would be a simple matter to turn a sleeve with a metric inner diameter and an imperial outer diameter and use the bearing with the next larger size inner.
Make the sleeve 4 thou undersize and shrink fit it. Works a treat.
its not as strait forward :( the wall thickness on the smaller one isnt big enough to fit the largser bearing mk4-mk3 isnt easy mk3-mk4 would be possable this way :(

ive got both hubs so i can take some measurments for you :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby carnut1100 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:37 am

Fantastic!
If you could do some measurements and maybe a rough sketch of the 2 types of hubs, I can mesure up a Falcon hub, and maybe if you could measure the stub axles on the Mk 4 and the early types?

I can draw everything up properly in AutoCAD ( which is a big part of my Engineering course) and look at making some hubs to fit, maybe reducing the track at the same time.
My lathe could easily swing a 150mm diameter hub no problem as long as i can get the bright steel for it....
1979 Mk2 Truck Project thread here
User avatar
carnut1100
Transit Aficionado
Transit Aficionado
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:18 am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Postby Luke » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:24 pm

right roughly the mk4 bearing O/D is 64mm and the mk3 casting O/D is 65mm :( - the mk4 casting is way thicker :!:

the only way to do it would be a bearing with the mk3 o/d and mk4 i/d - mabe it is possable, but for mine even mk1 hubs would not be narrow enough so i didnt persure it any further :D

i'll get some more accurate measurements of the hubs/ stubs later :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby Luke » Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:14 pm

bit of info for anyone contemplating doing this job, ever since ive had it running there has been a tight spot at one point on the steering, it was hardly noticable (although the MOT man noticed it and thought it was the rack it wasnt) when i changed it to a power rack it was almost gone (the MOT man tried it and didnt notice it), but i could tell it was there because i was looking for it, anyway it bugged me so i had to sort it :D
i thought it could be the column bent so i swapped that - wasnt that
i shimmed the column and could get it better but not rid of it, eventually i came to the conclusion the angle of the u/j's connecting the column to the rack must be too steep, exadurated by the fact i moved the entire crossmember back to get my wheels more central.

so...... today i fitted 4 spacers to move the rack forward by 40mm - took it for a test run and it was perfect 8)

i need to make a decent bracket to hold it solid as at the moment the rack could come loose and move sideways :shock:
i'll post a pic of it here when i do :D its also given me the chance to lower the engine a couple of mm - to give me more clearance at the top 8)

just thought i'd add that incase anyone is contemplating doing this as its took me a fair time to sort it out :)
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44530
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Postby Gunslinger » Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:32 pm

that could be invaluable for anyone doing this, steering and suspension geometry can be a tricky thing when doing stuff on the fly like this
User avatar
Gunslinger
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 1720
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 12:24 pm
Location: west oxfordshire

Postby rover » Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:03 am

eventually i came to the conclusion the angle of the u/j's connecting the column to the rack must be too steep, exadurated by the fact i moved the entire crossmember back to get my wheels more central.


Dont like to say "I told you so" but.... :wink:

At least you got there in the end :D

Rover.
User avatar
rover
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:03 am
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: Mk1 and 2 independant front suspension conversion!

Postby BOLTON WANDERER » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:09 pm

Thanks for this thread, you have just talked me out of it :lol: :lol:

i have a mk2 ci travelhome and a mk 4 diesel, the latter i bought for the engine to fit to the ci
but discoverd it has rack and pinion steering i was seriosly thinking about swapping this over untill i saw this thread, i think i will just have to live with changing lanes without moving the steering wheel. :mrgreen:
IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT!!

EVERYBODY'S ENTITLED TO MY OPINION

GROWING OLD IS INEVITABLE
GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
User avatar
BOLTON WANDERER
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: BOLTON

PreviousNext

Return to Customising and one offs



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.