Moderator: Luke
sleepy wrote:Campers are more often than not worth more than vans anyway, so financially it cant really be a loser![]()
Rover.
Luke wrote:The mk2 is worth more as a van but the mk3 is worth more as a camperso i'd do it!! make sense
![]()
![]()
just gotta be confident you can fill the windows over good enough!!!![]()
btw an L reg is a mk4- hope fred dont read this
have a look here it shows the 'small' changes ford did between the mk3/4/5MRspivvy wrote:Is it? is that what they called a "new generation" van then? apart from the lights and grille I couldnt see a lot of difference between it and a mk3...
MRspivvy wrote:Luke wrote:The mk2 is worth more as a van but the mk3 is worth more as a camperso i'd do it!! make sense
![]()
![]()
just gotta be confident you can fill the windows over good enough!!!![]()
btw an L reg is a mk4- hope fred dont read this
Is it? is that what they called a "new generation" van then? apart from the lights and grille I couldnt see a lot of difference between it and a mk3...
I've had a play with the engine and tweaked the fuel pump slightly. no smoke, but what a difference! it was overtaking smiley front ones going up the hills to merthyr. could be beneficial NOT having an EGR valve too..
i ve yet to see one that you can t tell its had windows the filler always cracks just buy a mk 2 vanLuke wrote:The mk2 is worth more as a van but the mk3 is worth more as a camperso i'd do it!! make sense
![]()
![]()
just gotta be confident you can fill the windows over good enough!!!![]()
btw an L reg is a mk4- hope fred dont read this
Neil wrote: i ve yet to see one that you can t tell its had windows the filler always cracks just buy a mk 2 van
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.