*NOW BOOKED FOR 2026* Transitmania 17 @ Santa Pod 17th to 19th July 2026 *ALL DETAILS HERE*


Mark 6 advice

Use this forum to highlight the areas to check when looking to buy a Transit

Moderator: Luke

Mark 6 advice

Postby chrispidgeon » Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:34 pm

Hello All

Had a quick look around, and learnt alot. I need a Transit, for my band. PA, drums, instruments etc. I amhoping to get for a Mk6, and could stretch to about £4000 as long as it is a good one, but would like to spend a bit less.

The questions which I have not found much info on concern:

1. Which models are most reliable - or are there any that are not reliable in particular.
2. Not keen on a dual mass flywheel, due to the problems common in Ford cars with them fitted - which engines have a normal lod styleee flywheel. RElated to reliability again I guess.
3. Performance - not a huge issue, would look to good mpg and cheap running/service costs first. Which would you fold recommend. I think lo or med roof will be fine, and short or med wheelbaswe. FWD should be fine too.

Basically, as long as it is reliable, will cruise at 70-75 with no problem, and is easy on the fuel, I will be happy.

Which would you get?

Thanks

Chris
chrispidgeon
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby chrispidgeon » Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:03 pm

anyone?

Or point me to some threads I might have missed please.

Thanks

Chris
chrispidgeon
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby Luke » Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:38 pm

chrispidgeon wrote:1. Which models are most reliable - or are there any that are not reliable in particular.
baiscally the lower BHP ie the 75ps engined models are the most reliable aslo come without a DMF :D
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
 
Posts: 44527
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:53 am
Location: Rotherham, Yorkshire!!

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby the gardener » Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:28 pm

SWB 100T280 Medium roof FWD, 2001 built, 2002 registered and I'd have another in a flash. Had a 80/280 mk5 and only better thing about the mk5 was electric windows and mirrors, it was slow compared!
User avatar
the gardener
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Ether

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby chrispidgeon » Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:56 pm

nice one, thansk for the advice. need to start the search now.
chrispidgeon
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby sc_BK » Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:26 pm

As Luke says the 75ps are the simpler/more reliable engines but you won't be doing 70-75 up a hill, espcially when you're loaded :wink: :lol:
User avatar
sc_BK
Remapped by Vantuner
 
Posts: 6100
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:14 am
Location: Ross Shire............. Transit: Mk7 LWB

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby chrispidgeon » Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:19 pm

right, been doing my homework and a bit of searching. Best seen so far is a SWB Semi high roof, 54 plate, 58,000 miles, FSH, 1 prev owner. Tidy. Pulls a bit to the left, I suspect it is the tracking, easily sorted, dealer will put on 3 tyres I think too.

I can get it for £5695 + VAT. Is this a decent deal in the opinion of anyone here?

Also, slightly inrelated, but how tall is this model (exterior height)?

Cheers

Chris
chrispidgeon
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby the gardener » Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:59 pm

I think it's 2.4m, certainly doesn't get under municipal car park barriers!!!
User avatar
the gardener
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Ether

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby Guy88 » Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:06 pm

If you want to get under the barriers get a FWD low roof they have almost the same internal height as a MK5 semi high

In FWD id go with the 100ps engine and depending on weight a T300 perhaps even consider an ex bt even thou there only 85ps

If there is a lot of weight perhaps consider a 330 RWD, but you would have a higher floor
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty
1992 MK3 ambulance
1980 A Series crew cab
1984 A series RB44

REMAPPED BY http://WWW.VANTUNER.COM HE IS THE WAY FORWARD

LIVIN' LOUD
User avatar
Guy88
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 17042
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Banbury, oxon

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby chrispidgeon » Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:25 pm

yeah, its just a question of size really. The semi high swb is definitely big enough, and it is nice to be able to stand up (almost) in it too.

So, the fwd low roofs go in carparks no problem then? They dont go in my garage..

I tried a low roof 75ps today. it was ok, but I could hear a hissing when the revs rose - I suspect turbo trouble, although it had only done £39k..and seemes to pull fine. It is a 51 p[late, and the chap thought the earlier ones had louder turbos. The 54 plate I drove later has no hissing at all.

bit of a minefield this!
chrispidgeon
Transit Addict
Transit Addict
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby 100 T280 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:12 pm

100 ps FWD, or 115ps RWD if you can find one, you won't be able to stand up straight in a RWD medium roof though.

FWD 100 (no DMF) will sit at 80 or 90 all day long, if I drive mine carefully (slowly :roll: ) I get as much as 38 MPG with the aircon on too.

125ps TDci if you have the money, quick, very quiet, with DMF 8)
'02 100 T280 SWB Exec. FWD Medium Roof 2.0 DuraTorq TDdi 100ps
College Blue, Alloys, Eberspächer, Twin Batteries, Single Seat,
"Park Distance Control", AirCon, Rev. Counter, 7000RDS.......
Image
User avatar
100 T280
Transit Devotee
Transit Devotee
 
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:10 pm
Location: Midlands

Re: Mark 6 advice

Postby madmark » Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:16 pm

also check for oil leeks around the sump area! :wink:
madmark
Transit Extremist
Transit Extremist
 
Posts: 15467
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:29 am


Return to Buyers Guide



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.